- A surprising judgment was handed down by a German Court, ruling that a rare poster collection stolen by the Nazi Gestapo, although legally owned by the Jewish heir of the original owner Hans Sachs, could remain in a museum because the heir has no legal remedy to possess the collection.
- Suzanne Glass, the great granddaughter of Hans Sachs, has written a more intimate take on the story behind the aforementioned rare poster collection.
- The First Circuit Court of Appeals hands down major victory for artists and rules in favor of Christoph Buchel, holding Mass MoCA to be in violation of Buchel's right to artistic integtrity.
- Beginning in 1473 with the earliest documented instance of art theft, numerous works of art have been stolen by a variety of criminals, but the multiple thefts of Munch's The Scream trumps them all.
- Following an international precedent of returning looted cultural heritage, the Bolivian government will return four colonial oil paintings to Argentina after they were stolen two years ago.
- Is archaeological discovery a good thing when it leads to destruction? The reactivation of interest in archaeology from new discoveries and subsequent television programs about antiquities could be cause of recent tomb looting in China.
- A panel discussion titled Collectors, Dealers, Museums & the Law, with the purpose of increasing awareness of cultural property laws as well as the legal responsibilities of collectors, dealers, and museums, will take place February 11th, at noon Pacific, in San Rafael, California.
- Perhaps the only way to decrease the illicit removal of cultural objects in India is if protective measures are professionalized and creative partnerships developed with local communities.
- Although speculation as to the authenticity of the Archaic Mark (Gospel of Mark) codex has been rife for more than 60 years, US scholars and scientists have proven that one of the jewels of the University of Chicago’s manuscript collection is a skilled late 19th- or early 20th-century forgery.
- New Trend Alert: Museums and Gallery's exhibiting forgeries, the artists who create these fakes, and skilled tactics used to detect forged art, like the two week exhibition at London’s Victoria & Albert Museum.
- 2009 proved to be a horrendous year for the Museum world, but 2010 brings a mood of cautious optimism.
- David Gill discusses the issue of the looting on archaeological sites to provide material for the market and to fund organized crime, and Christina Ruiz discusses funding terrorism, specifically 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta's attempted sale of Afghan loot to a German archaeologist.
- A Defense attorney in the four-corners antiquities investigation is raising questions about the unnamed informant. The sources was integral to the Government's 2½-year multistate investigation into illegal artifact trafficking of objects from Pueblan civilizations.
Jan 29, 2010
Footnotes
Jan 28, 2010
Footnotes, Jan. 28
- Mark Durney notes how much more attention we pay to damaged masterworks than to outright art theft.
- artnet weighs the cultural destruction in Haiti.
- Just how much does Zahi Hawass focus on pulling in revenue?
- Donn Zaretsky and Michael Rushton have had an all-too-rare intelligent discussion on the deaccession of art.
- Tourists were stranded after mudslides near Machu Picchu.
- More discussion of fake antiquities at Safecorner.
Jan 27, 2010
Barford on the Sale of Egyptian Antiquities
Archaeologist Paul Barford has an interesting post on the sale of antiquities in Egypt. He's had a number of interesting posts on his time on an excavation there, but I was really interested in his post Monday. He talks about his quest for some fake antiquities, and was offered some shabtis. These small funerary figurines were placed in graves, perhaps as servants meant to serve the deceased in the afterlife. Pictured here are shabtis on display in the Louvre. Barford states the "current modes of no-questions asked collecting are directly contributing to the creation of the market which is the motor behind the looting of archaeological sites for saleable objects." I think I agree with him that buyers are fueling the looting of sites. But there are other contributing causes: the paucity of resources in these areas for law enforcement; the desire by visitors and tourists to buy these objects; and the lack of site security when archaeologists leave. The answer is responsible scrutiny of these transactions, but also the importance of outreach and education of these buyers and the local communities about the value of responsible stewardship of these sites and objects.
Barford writes:
I've had similar experiences at ancient sites as I'm sure many of you have. Pictured here is a man selling small stone 'zapotec' figurines at Monte Alban in Oaxaca Mexico this summer. I don't have the expertise required to tell if these are fakes or not. I've always assumed, as Barford did, that these locals are selling fakes.
Barford writes:
Last night in a Luxor sidestreet on my quest for the best or the most bizarre fake artefacts, in a grubby shop I'd overlooked before, I was offered several shabtis and shabti fragments which I am pretty sure were not fakes. All the dealer offered as provenance was "here and there". After I had correctly identified the fakes he'd mixed in to test whether his customer knew his onions, he showed me a lot more. I told him that in his country there was a new law under discussion which would make merely having them in his shop punishable by up to twenty five years. I was not terribly surprised that he would not show me the "authentic scarabs" after that. Those suppliers "here and there" who sold them to him knew that these items were saleable to visiting foreigners.
The day before, I was walking across the palace site at Malkata, showing it to some colleagues, and had just replaced the cardboard "protecting" the wall paintings when a guy in a dark robe came running up. "Closed, closed, zis site he closed" he panted. He was presumably the "gafir" who was guarding this site for the SCA. Once he realised he could not make cash out of showing us the wall paintings which I'd just shown people, he then pulled out of his pocket a blue-painted sherd, the "Armarna ware" which I have seen on the Internet being sold at 300 dollars a piece and asked whether I would like to "see" it. It looked remarkably like the one I'd found there a few weeks earlier and put under a nearby bush to protect it from the sun and weather. I told him where he could put it. Interestingly this was after I had pulled out the photo-identity document issued by the SCA authorising me as an archaeologist to visit sites like this.
. . .
What is interesing about this is Malkata is littered with pottery, tonnes of it. Most of it from the Eighteenth dynasty, including some nice red wares (lovely colours), slipped ware, fine bowls, burnished ware. Yet neither of the would-be vandors had picked any of this up, they knew their market, the blue-painted pottery is coveted by western collectors and that is what they were stealing from the site to make a bit of cash. . . .
Jan 25, 2010
Seminar Paper: William M. V. Kingsland and the Importance of Provenance
I'm publishing here a series of papers written by law students in my 'Property, Heritage and the Arts' seminar from the Fall of 2009. This paper was written by Michael Poché
William M. V. Kingsland and the Importance of Provenance
1. Introduction
Nature, left undisturbed, so fashions her territory as to give it almost unchanging permanence of form, outline, and proportion, except when shattered by geologic convulsions. . . . In countries untrodden by man, the proportions and relative positions of land and water. . . are subject to change only from geological influences so slow in their operation that the geographical conditions may be regarded as constant and immutable. Man has too long forgotten that the earth was given to him for usufruct alone, not for consumption, still less for profligate waste. . . But she has left it within the power of man irreparably to derange the combinations of inorganic matter and of organic life. . . man is everywhere a disturbing agent. Wherever he plants his foot, the harmonies of nature are turned to discords. . . [O]f all organic beings, man alone is to be regarded as essentially a destructive power….George Perkins Marsh, The Earth as Modified by Human Action: Man and Nature [fn1]
When George Perkins Marsh first penned those words in 1874, he was speaking in his role as one of America’s first important environmentalists. Contrary to the prevailing notions of his contemporaries, Marsh felt that, rather than being owners of the earth – as in the traditional Abrahamic concept of property – we are in fact only stewards of the earth, here for a short time only, and that instead of practicing some supposed birthright over the land, we were instead bound by a birth “duty”, so to speak, to protect it.
Though his expertise was in the environment (as well as diplomacy and philology), Marsh may as well have been speaking about the art world; the philosophy of guardianship he espoused towards the Earth would serve us well as a basic model for how humankind should safeguard its cultural riches. One of the few things which can be said with some certainty about art is that nearly every culture throughout human history has spent time creating works which are largely decorative in nature; the big question is, “Why?” While we still do not possess an all-encompassing answer to that question, the question itself is strongly suggestive that the creative act, in its myriad forms, is some form primal human strategy, on par with survival, sustenance, procreation, etc.
It is here that the comparison to Marsh’s quotation becomes problematic; Marsh saw man as “. . . essentially a destructive power.”[fn2] This is true, but he is also the only consciously creative power as well. Because of this dual nature, it is important to ensure that our destructive tendencies do not overshadow our creative ones. Now, clearly, not every person has a creative (or rather, artistic) bent. For some of those who do not, art may be nothing more than a blank slate; some may be appreciators, either highly opinionated or more catholic in taste; but some have an almost hostile stance towards art, which could manifest itself in numerous ways.
Much environmental advocacy is practiced from a state of naiveté and pessimism; that is, we don’t know what the long range effects of our actions will be – and we are assuming that our actions and their effects will be negative – so a prudent course would be to treat our environment as cautiously as possible. And so it should be with our cultural heritage: because we don’t fully understand why people have always made art, it would behoove us to assume that the fact of its universality indicates its importance to our existence. As we are only stewards of this Earth, so too are we stewards of our cultural legacy.
One of the primary tools we have at our disposal to this end is that of provenance. Provenance acts as a sort of cultural lineage, or a chain of succession. It ensures the integrity and value of art, as well as provides a guidepost of authenticity. It is especially important when purchasing art; potential buyers need to be made aware of a piece’s particular history, and failure to be able to do so should be a big red flag to purchasers, be they newbies or long time connoisseurs.
So, what to say of someone who, despite an obvious love for art, so eradicates the provenance of, not one or a few, but of close to three hundred valuable pieces[fn3] that they end up languishing in the hands of the F.B.I., awaiting either return to their rightful owners or an uncertain fate on the auction block, where disinterested relations of the previous “owner” hope they will eventually end up?
Continue
Cyprus Antiquities Smugglers Discovered
Police in Cyprus have detained ten people over the weekend and are looking for five more after the discovery of an international antiquities-smuggling ring believed to be the largest such discovery in Cyprus's history. The objects seized may be worth more than 11m euros, and include pottery, coins, figurines, some of which may be 4,000 years old. Many of the objects may have originated elsewhere, and authorities now are attempting to determine the origins of many of the objects. The BBC points out that Cyprus was an important crossroads in the ancient Mediterranean, with armies and merchants from Egypt, the Roman Empire, Persia, and others. This may make it difficult to trace the origin of these objects, many of which could plausibly have originated from dozens of modern-day nations. The smugglers of course were likely to have disguised or destroyed any evidence of the history of these objects.
- Cyprus smuggling ring broken up, BBC, January 25, 2010.
Jan 21, 2010
Antiquities Speakers at George Washington
Via David Gill I see that George Washington University is bringing in speakers to discuss antiquities issues. The series is entitled"Museums and Antiquities". Tonight will be James Cuno, sure to offer some provoking opinions: James Cuno: “Museums, Antiquities, and the Politics of Cultural Property". If any readers end up attending, please drop me a line with any observations.
Coming up will be:
(via)
Coming up will be:
- February 18, 2010. Patty Gerstenblith: "Museums and the Market: Preserving the Past by Regulating the Market in Antiquities”
- March 4, 2010. Malcolm Bell: "Archaeologists’ Views on Collecting Antiquities"
(via)
Jan 19, 2010
9th Circuit Denies Limitations Appeal by Marei Von Saher
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled on a claim over these two 500 year-old works by Lucas Cranach the Elder, Adam and Eve. As I wrote back in 2008, this case presents some interesting issues of timeliness. It grapples with the question of whether states may enact more beneficial limitations restrictions, allowing certain claimants to bring actions. The claimant, Marei Von Saher is the successor in interest to Jacques Goudstikker who bought the works in a 1931 auction in Berlin. The works remained there in Amsterdam until 1940 when the Nazis instituted a forced sale.
After the war, Desiree Goudstikker reached a settlement with the Dutch government. She received some of her husband's inventory, but did not claim another set of works because that would have meant returning the purchase price received from the Germans.
The Dutch government transferred these Cranachs to George Stroganoff-Scherbatoff, the descendant of a noble Russian family who was thought to have lost the paintings to the Bolsheviks during the Russian Revolution. Stroganoff-Scherbatoff sold these works to the Norton Simon Museum in 1971. The 9th Circuit held first that California's special limitations rule for works looted during the Holocauset era, Sec. 354.3 conflicts with the foreign affairs doctrine. Though it does not conflict with Executive Branch policy via the President, it does conflict with a power reserved to the Federal government, as California created a "world-wide forum for the resolution of Holocaust restitution claims".
As a consequence, the claim was left to general limitations principles. In California the Discovery Rule applies. A claimant must bring her action within three years of discovering her claim. This means actual discovery, but also when a reasonably prudent claimant should have discovered she had a claim. Given that the museum acquired the work in 1971, this will surely make victory a difficult proposition.
- Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, --- F. 3d ---, 2010 WL 114959 (9th Cir. 2010).
- Mike Boehm, Woman seeking return of looted art from Norton Simon Museum loses appeal - latimes.com, L.A. Times, January 16, 2010.
- Orkin v. Taylor
Jan 18, 2010
Are the Black Hills Cultural Property?
That was the provocative question posed by Melissa Tatum at the AALS Annual Meeting here in New Orleans last weekend. First, a little background. The Black Hills are a beautiful but small mountain range extending from South Dakota into Wyoming. Today the region is home to Mount Rushmore, numerous National monuments, the in-progress Crazy Horse Memorial, and the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally. But of course before 19th century Americans moved to the area, it was the home of indigenous groups; first the Cheyenne, and later the Lakota.
Apologies for any mistakes in this history, but as I understand it in 1868, the United States signed the Treaty of Fort Laramie, which essentially gave the Lakota nation ownership of the Black Hills. This treaty was signed after the Lakota defeated U.S. forces. Soon after though this treaty was violated until it was eventually revoked. Tatum noted that the city of Deadwood was founded at this time, and references the recent HBO show. "Deadwood" was set in the 1870's, and was based on the real life people and events of the town's early history. The town began as a mining camp, in an area outside of the law. The very founding of the camp was illegal, as the land was owned by the Lakota people. The show examines this lawlessness in a number of ways. In the real Deadwood, it was the discovery of gold which brought miners to the area. This led to armed conflict (including Custer's defeat) which culminated in 1877 when the Federal governemnt seized control of the Black Hills for good.
In 1980, the Sioux nation won a hard fought court victory. United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980). The Supreme Court upheld an award for the value of the land in 1877, along with 103 years of interest. However the Sioux have refused to accept this sum, and instead want the return of the land.
Against this background, Tatum asked whether existing Cultural Property law might provide a remedy allowing the Sioux to secure the return of the land itself. In so doing, she moved the conversation beyond the typical repatriation request and instead challenged some of the basing foundations of cultural property law itself. She argued property should be amended to offer legal definitions which are more culture-specific. Tatum also asked whether the Black Hills might fit within some of the definitions of cultural property as provided in the 1954 Hague Convention, and various UNESCO conventions, including the 1970 Convention. She offered as one solution, the potential for multiple cultures to use and enjoy public lands. This is the current model in many Federal land management systems.
Tatum put cultural property scholarship into concrete terms, pointing out why the Sioux should be entitled to some remedy, and offering a pointed critique of the current flaws in cultural property law. I'm very much looking forward to the final paper.
Apologies for any mistakes in this history, but as I understand it in 1868, the United States signed the Treaty of Fort Laramie, which essentially gave the Lakota nation ownership of the Black Hills. This treaty was signed after the Lakota defeated U.S. forces. Soon after though this treaty was violated until it was eventually revoked. Tatum noted that the city of Deadwood was founded at this time, and references the recent HBO show. "Deadwood" was set in the 1870's, and was based on the real life people and events of the town's early history. The town began as a mining camp, in an area outside of the law. The very founding of the camp was illegal, as the land was owned by the Lakota people. The show examines this lawlessness in a number of ways. In the real Deadwood, it was the discovery of gold which brought miners to the area. This led to armed conflict (including Custer's defeat) which culminated in 1877 when the Federal governemnt seized control of the Black Hills for good.
In 1980, the Sioux nation won a hard fought court victory. United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980). The Supreme Court upheld an award for the value of the land in 1877, along with 103 years of interest. However the Sioux have refused to accept this sum, and instead want the return of the land.
Against this background, Tatum asked whether existing Cultural Property law might provide a remedy allowing the Sioux to secure the return of the land itself. In so doing, she moved the conversation beyond the typical repatriation request and instead challenged some of the basing foundations of cultural property law itself. She argued property should be amended to offer legal definitions which are more culture-specific. Tatum also asked whether the Black Hills might fit within some of the definitions of cultural property as provided in the 1954 Hague Convention, and various UNESCO conventions, including the 1970 Convention. She offered as one solution, the potential for multiple cultures to use and enjoy public lands. This is the current model in many Federal land management systems.
Tatum put cultural property scholarship into concrete terms, pointing out why the Sioux should be entitled to some remedy, and offering a pointed critique of the current flaws in cultural property law. I'm very much looking forward to the final paper.
Jan 16, 2010
Jan 15, 2010
More on the Getty Bronze
Jason Felch has an interesting story updating the long history of this bronze statue known either as the "Getty Bronze", the "Fano athelete", or the "Bronze statue of a victorious youth". I wrote a very long summery of the dispute back in 2007. The statue was found by fisherman in the Adriatic in 1964, was smuggled out of Italy, and was eventually purchased by the Getty in 1977. As Felch rightly points out, this dispute does not fit neatly into the legal framework governing many antiquities dispute. This bronze really was found by accident, and early Italian attempt to prosecute the fisherman were unsuccessful.
The bronze was discussed a great deal in the very public battle between Italy and the Getty over other looted objects. There was a lack of direct evidence linking the Getty to any wrongdoing in the acquisition. However at "Times reporter" has uncovered a letter and other documents which reveal there were serious questions regarding the statue:
1976 letter from Ashmole to Garrett referring to “the crime”
These documents should not come as any real surprise I don't think. And though they may not provide enough of a legal basis to secure the return of the bronze, but they will add to the growing public pressure which Italy may try to exert to secure the return of the statue.
The bronze was discussed a great deal in the very public battle between Italy and the Getty over other looted objects. There was a lack of direct evidence linking the Getty to any wrongdoing in the acquisition. However at "Times reporter" has uncovered a letter and other documents which reveal there were serious questions regarding the statue:
1976 letter from Ashmole to Garrett referring to “the crime”
These documents should not come as any real surprise I don't think. And though they may not provide enough of a legal basis to secure the return of the bronze, but they will add to the growing public pressure which Italy may try to exert to secure the return of the statue.
- Jason Felch, A twist in Getty Museum's Italian court saga - latimes.com, L.A. Times, January 14, 2010.
Jan 14, 2010
Seminar Paper: The Google Books Settlement Agreement
I'm publishing here a series of papers written by law students in my 'Property, Heritage and the Arts' seminar from the Fall of 2009. This paper was written by Matthew Detiveaux:
With the digital age now at its heyday, everything changes. When we want to know something about a topic, we Google or Wikipedia it. When we want to see what something looks like, we perform an image search. When we want to hear an artist, we “download” them. When we want to read a book, Google hopes that we will use Google Books to find it, preview it, and gain access to it.
Using complicated algorithms similar to those used to fuel what is arguably the world’s most sophisticated web browser, Google has unveiled Google Books[i]. Like Google’s other services, Google Books provides a simple, intuitive interface built around the user’s needs. Google has made its name on being the web browser of choice for just about everyone. Many turn to Google for e-mail (Gmail[ii]), driving directions (Google Maps[iii]), news (Google News[iv]), social interaction (Orkut[v]), streaming video (YouTube[vi]), and even cell phone service (the T-Mobile G1, powered by a Google Operating System[vii]). Google’s new hat is not only that of a librarian; Google wants to be the largest, most comprehensive digital library in the world. This is right in accord with Google’s mission: “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”[viii]
Google, Inc. was founded in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, two Stanford Ph.D. candidates who developed algorithms to “data mine” the far reaches of the Internet and bring the most relevant and useful pages forward in a search tool.[ix] The patented PageRank[x] search formulas are highly complicated, with more than 500 million variables and 2 billion terms being used to run its search engine in 1999 alone. Not so confusing are the economics. On January 22, 2009, Google announced fourth quarter financial revenues of $5.7 billion, an 18% increase, when compared to 2007 fourth quarter earnings.[xi] Google, repeatedly voted one of the best places to work in America, is a household name and a Goliath when it comes to the Internet.
Continue.
The Google Books Settlement Agreement:
A New Rubric for Cultural Heritage Management and Privatization?
A New Rubric for Cultural Heritage Management and Privatization?
With the digital age now at its heyday, everything changes. When we want to know something about a topic, we Google or Wikipedia it. When we want to see what something looks like, we perform an image search. When we want to hear an artist, we “download” them. When we want to read a book, Google hopes that we will use Google Books to find it, preview it, and gain access to it.
Using complicated algorithms similar to those used to fuel what is arguably the world’s most sophisticated web browser, Google has unveiled Google Books[i]. Like Google’s other services, Google Books provides a simple, intuitive interface built around the user’s needs. Google has made its name on being the web browser of choice for just about everyone. Many turn to Google for e-mail (Gmail[ii]), driving directions (Google Maps[iii]), news (Google News[iv]), social interaction (Orkut[v]), streaming video (YouTube[vi]), and even cell phone service (the T-Mobile G1, powered by a Google Operating System[vii]). Google’s new hat is not only that of a librarian; Google wants to be the largest, most comprehensive digital library in the world. This is right in accord with Google’s mission: “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.”[viii]
Google, Inc. was founded in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, two Stanford Ph.D. candidates who developed algorithms to “data mine” the far reaches of the Internet and bring the most relevant and useful pages forward in a search tool.[ix] The patented PageRank[x] search formulas are highly complicated, with more than 500 million variables and 2 billion terms being used to run its search engine in 1999 alone. Not so confusing are the economics. On January 22, 2009, Google announced fourth quarter financial revenues of $5.7 billion, an 18% increase, when compared to 2007 fourth quarter earnings.[xi] Google, repeatedly voted one of the best places to work in America, is a household name and a Goliath when it comes to the Internet.
Continue.
Jan 13, 2010
Forfeitted Pissarro Returning to France
A federal jury has ruled that this Pissaro painting, "Le Marché," was stolen from the Faure Museum in Aix-la-Bains in France. The work was seized by ICE agents from Sotheby's in 2006, after its theft in 1981. The thief took the work from the museum under his jacket. The work has a storied history as the Department of Justice Press Release describes.
It seems that in 1985 the thief, Emile Guelton, sold the work to Sharyl Davis who was using space art gallery in San Antonio owned by Jay Adelman. Mr. Adelman seems to operate an antiques shop on the Riverwalk, and operate a website. In 2003 the work was consigned to Sotheby's by Davis. Davis paid $8,500 for the painting in 1985, and estimated an auction price of $60-80,000. However Sotheby's asked about the history of the work and was told it was purchased from someone named "Frenchie". But then Davis asked for "Frenchie's" real name from Adelman, who told her it was Guelton and that he was from Paris. That information appeared in the auction catalog with an image of Le Marché."
The Pissarro was then forfeited under the National Stolen Property Act. Forfeiture allows prosecutors to bring a suit against an object which was part of a crime, and all claimants to the object come forward to challenge the forfeiture. It is a powerful tool for prosecutors, and thus should be used carefully, else we may risk losing works of art for many years. It seems like the right result was achieved in this case. Mark Durney rightly points out that this round-about story reveals a lot about how difficult recovering stolen art is and how easy it is to acquire in "good faith".
It seems that in 1985 the thief, Emile Guelton, sold the work to Sharyl Davis who was using space art gallery in San Antonio owned by Jay Adelman. Mr. Adelman seems to operate an antiques shop on the Riverwalk, and operate a website. In 2003 the work was consigned to Sotheby's by Davis. Davis paid $8,500 for the painting in 1985, and estimated an auction price of $60-80,000. However Sotheby's asked about the history of the work and was told it was purchased from someone named "Frenchie". But then Davis asked for "Frenchie's" real name from Adelman, who told her it was Guelton and that he was from Paris. That information appeared in the auction catalog with an image of Le Marché."
Just before the auction, French federal law enforcement officers learned that Le Marché was at Sotheby's. Based on the information in the auction catalog, the French officers located, contacted, and interviewed Guelton. Guelton confirmed that he knew Adelman, was living in Texas in 1985, sent a container of artwork from France to the United States in 1984, and sold Adelman paintings. The French officers, using a prior arrest photo of Guelton, created a six-person photo array, which they showed to the Faure Museum guard in October 2003.
The Pissarro was then forfeited under the National Stolen Property Act. Forfeiture allows prosecutors to bring a suit against an object which was part of a crime, and all claimants to the object come forward to challenge the forfeiture. It is a powerful tool for prosecutors, and thus should be used carefully, else we may risk losing works of art for many years. It seems like the right result was achieved in this case. Mark Durney rightly points out that this round-about story reveals a lot about how difficult recovering stolen art is and how easy it is to acquire in "good faith".
Jan 12, 2010
History and Looting in Costa Rica
Maggie Koerth-Baker has a terrific two-part series on the ancient Chibchan culture in Costa Rica at BoingBoing. The ancient CAribbean shares many characteristics with the ancient Mediterranean, in which a number of cultures traded and impacted each other. Yet Costa Rica receives relatively little attention:
She talks with Michael Snarskis, an archaeologist examining ancient Costa Rican cultures. The series does a terrific job documenting the damage done by looting, something archaeologists must account for in nearly every excavation in Costa Rica and elsewhere. Are there any archaeological sites not at risk from looters?
Ancient Costa Rica Part I: Lost history in the land of the crossroads
Ancient Costa Rica Part II: The narrow road to Guayabo
Despite a scarcity of giant tourist-attracting monuments, ancient Costa Rica was a pretty hopping place—a nexus of trade where the cultures of Mexico and Central America met those of northern South America, and elements of both were incorporated into the unique and diverse Chibchan culture. Gold ornaments, jade carvings and pottery are literally just below the surface, uncovered by modern construction—or even just poking around in the backyard. So why the low profile? Blame the combined forces of local climate, indigenous tragedy and looting as national pastime.
She talks with Michael Snarskis, an archaeologist examining ancient Costa Rican cultures. The series does a terrific job documenting the damage done by looting, something archaeologists must account for in nearly every excavation in Costa Rica and elsewhere. Are there any archaeological sites not at risk from looters?
Ancient Costa Rica Part I: Lost history in the land of the crossroads
Ancient Costa Rica Part II: The narrow road to Guayabo
Jan 11, 2010
2,000 Art Thefts in France in 2008
That is the estimate given by French police Colonel Stephane Gauffeny. 2,000 is a staggering number, but apparently is a dramatic reduction from a decade ago. He tells Roland Lloyd Parry of AFP: "We concentrate our energy on the biggest thefts or the biggest criminal rings". One example is the Drouot investigation, which is taking precedence and resources away from some other thefts. Italy is often a victim of art theft, but France is as well, with the recent holiday thefts and last year's Picasso Museum theft just some recent high profile examples. Pictured here is the Cantini Museum in Marseille where a Degas was "unscrewed" from a wall over the hiliday season, yet there were no signs of forced entry.
What happens to these stolen works? The mundane objects are stored until they can be sold later. The rare and valuable works are exported abroad illegally. Yet the rate of recovery for many of these works is very low. Yet the work of Colonel Gauffeny and others is key, and one of the important steps law enforcement agencies can take is to start keeping track and compiling statistics on art theft.
What happens to these stolen works? The mundane objects are stored until they can be sold later. The rare and valuable works are exported abroad illegally. Yet the rate of recovery for many of these works is very low. Yet the work of Colonel Gauffeny and others is key, and one of the important steps law enforcement agencies can take is to start keeping track and compiling statistics on art theft.
- Lloyd Parry Roland, AFP: France battles theft of cultural treasures, AFP, January 10, 2010.
Making up for Looting with Art
Artist Andy Holden visited the Great Pyramid of Giza when he was 12, and took home an illegal souvenir. He "broke off a lump of stone from the side". He says that when his parents discovered his theft "they were furious and it ended up becoming this terrible guilt object".
Now, in an effort to make amends Holden has created a colossal knitted replica of the small rock at Tate Britain. he also has a video piece in which he is shown climbing the Pyramid and returning the rock to the place from which it was stolen. This was a theft, one wonders if Holden approached the Egyptians about his installation and return. He's doing the right thing now, though now he is profiting off of the theft, in a slightly more palatable way. The display now reveals the ease with which ancient monuments can be damaged, and perhaps will serve as a reminder for the next set of parents to keep a closer watch on their little looters at important monuments.
Roya Nikkah, Tate Show reveals artist's pyramid theft, The Telegraph, Jan. 10, 2010.
Now, in an effort to make amends Holden has created a colossal knitted replica of the small rock at Tate Britain. he also has a video piece in which he is shown climbing the Pyramid and returning the rock to the place from which it was stolen. This was a theft, one wonders if Holden approached the Egyptians about his installation and return. He's doing the right thing now, though now he is profiting off of the theft, in a slightly more palatable way. The display now reveals the ease with which ancient monuments can be damaged, and perhaps will serve as a reminder for the next set of parents to keep a closer watch on their little looters at important monuments.
Roya Nikkah, Tate Show reveals artist's pyramid theft, The Telegraph, Jan. 10, 2010.
Jan 6, 2010
Recreating Strawberry Hill
Strawberry Hill, the gothic-revival mansion in west London is currently in the midst of a £9m restoration. Martin Bailey has a terrific story in the Art Newspaper on the efforts to track down many of the objects which were originally included in the mansion.
Horace Walpole built the home in the 18th century, which is credited for the revival of the Gothic style in Victorian England. The building was inspired by the fan vaulting at Westminster Abbey, bits of tombs from Westminster and Canterbury, and the tomb of Edward the Confessor. When Walpole died in 1797, most of the objects remained at the mansion, but an auction in 1842 led to the loss of a number of the objects. The Strawberry Hill Trust is now eager to bring these objects back together, including paintings, sculpture, furniture, ceramics, glassware, weapons, relics and manuscripts.
Some of the most sought-after items include:
Horace Walpole built the home in the 18th century, which is credited for the revival of the Gothic style in Victorian England. The building was inspired by the fan vaulting at Westminster Abbey, bits of tombs from Westminster and Canterbury, and the tomb of Edward the Confessor. When Walpole died in 1797, most of the objects remained at the mansion, but an auction in 1842 led to the loss of a number of the objects. The Strawberry Hill Trust is now eager to bring these objects back together, including paintings, sculpture, furniture, ceramics, glassware, weapons, relics and manuscripts.
Some of the most sought-after items include:
1. A Roman funerary urn: The Roman urn appears below the window in a 1750s drawing of Walpole in his library by Johann Müntz. Its triangular top decoration has a tripod relief, supported by griffins.
2. Mirror with portrait of Viscount Malpas: There were two mirrors, and the lost mirror has a circular painting of Viscount Malpas. The Gothic mirror, with an ebonised wood frame, was sold in 1842 to Mrs Dawson Damer. Another mirror depicting the Earl of Orford survives (pictured, it was accepted in lieu of inheritance tax last year and will be displayed at Strawberry Hill).
3. Ornate Turkish dagger: The ornate dagger was reputed to have belonged to Henry VIII. In 1842 it was bought by actor Charles Kean, who is said to have used it on the stage. It was sold at Christie’s in 1898 to someone named as Haigham. It is depicted in a late 18th-century watercolour.
4. Gothic dining table Commissioned by Walpole in 1754, the top is of Sicilian jasper (6 x 3 feet), with the frame in black. An early 19th-century drawing of it survives. The ornately decorated table was last recorded in 1953, when it was owned by antiquarian Harry Bradfer-Lawrence, of Ripon, Yorkshire, who died in 1965.
5. Basalt Bust of Vespasian: The colossal basalt bust had been in 10 Downing Street and was later put on display at Strawberry Hill. It is depicted in a watercolour view of Horace Walpole’s gallery. The bust was last recorded at Christie’s in 1893, after leaving the Hamilton Palace collection.
- Martin Bailey, Strawberry Hill on the hunt for lost Walpole treasures, The Art Newspaper, January 6, 2010.
Jan 5, 2010
Portable Antiquities Seized in Iraq
Iraqi police announced today the seizure of 39 antiquities discovered hidden near a shrine outside Nasiriyah in Southern Iraq. These included clay tablets and statues, some of which may date from the 4,000 year-old Sumerian civilization. Are these objects from one of Iraq's museums? Were these objects looted from nearby archaeological sites? If I could speculate on why the objects were hidden near a shrine: it may have been a convenient place to hide these looted objects for sale to visitors to the shrine.
- Katherine Houreld, Iraqi police seize artifacts amid smuggling fears - Washington Times, Associated Press, January 5, 2009.
Holiday Art Theft in Southern France
Two high-profile art thefts occurred in Southern France in and around the New Year.
The first was the theft of this work, Les Choristes by Edgar Degas which was reported missing from the Cantini Museum in Marseilles. The theft was discovered when the museum reopened after the holiday, and was on loan from the Musée d'Orsay which was set to end on January 3rd. The painting was unscrewed from the wall, and there was no evidence of forced entry. Mark Durney points out that 2009 began much the same way, with thefts from a Berlin art gallery, and Southern France is no stranger to art crime. The easy access the thief had to the work has led to the arrest of a night watchman at the museum.
The second theft occurred in in La Cadière d’Azur, a village in Provence. As many as thirty paintings were taken from a private home, including works by Picasso and Rousseau. The owner was on holiday in Sweden.
Big holidays are a difficult time for security. Police, owners and the public all have different priorities during these festive days, which makes art particularly vulnerable.
The first was the theft of this work, Les Choristes by Edgar Degas which was reported missing from the Cantini Museum in Marseilles. The theft was discovered when the museum reopened after the holiday, and was on loan from the Musée d'Orsay which was set to end on January 3rd. The painting was unscrewed from the wall, and there was no evidence of forced entry. Mark Durney points out that 2009 began much the same way, with thefts from a Berlin art gallery, and Southern France is no stranger to art crime. The easy access the thief had to the work has led to the arrest of a night watchman at the museum.
The second theft occurred in in La Cadière d’Azur, a village in Provence. As many as thirty paintings were taken from a private home, including works by Picasso and Rousseau. The owner was on holiday in Sweden.
Big holidays are a difficult time for security. Police, owners and the public all have different priorities during these festive days, which makes art particularly vulnerable.
- Picasso, Rousseau works stolen in France days after Degas drawing taken, Telegraph.
- AFP: Picasso, Rousseau paintings stolen in France, January 2, 2010.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Labels
"Bronze Statue of a Victorious Youth"
(17)
1954 Hague Convention
(12)
1972 World Heritage Convention
(1)
Aboriginal Heritage
(1)
Aboriginal Heritage Act 1988 (SA)
(2)
act of state doctrine
(1)
Admiralty Law
(11)
Afghanistan
(10)
Africa
(4)
Albright-Knox Gallery
(3)
Aleppo
(2)
Alfred Stieglitz
(2)
Alternative Dispute Resolution
(1)
Angkor
(1)
Anti-Seizure Legislation
(1)
antiquites
(3)
antiquities
(337)
Antiquities Act 1906
(2)
Antiquities leasing
(10)
antiquities looting
(4)
antiquities smuggling
(3)
antiquities theft
(6)
ARCA
(8)
ARCA Annual Conference
(10)
ARCA MA Program
(6)
Archaeological Resources Protection Act
(5)
Archival Recovery Team (ART)
(3)
Archives
(1)
Armed Conflict
(22)
Arrests
(79)
Art and Cultural Heritage Law
(1)
Art Beat Constables
(9)
Art Crime Statistics
(1)
art fraud
(9)
art history
(1)
Art Institute Chicago
(3)
art law
(1)
Art Loans
(9)
Art Loss Register
(19)
Art Market
(10)
Art Theft
(263)
Artist Resale Right
(1)
arts funding
(1)
Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD)
(8)
Athens
(3)
Auction
(99)
austerity
(2)
Australia
(7)
Austria
(3)
Authentication
(3)
Babylon
(3)
Banksy
(1)
Big Bend National Park
(1)
bilateral agreements
(2)
Black Hills
(1)
Bolton Forgers
(4)
Book Theft
(3)
Brazil
(5)
British Museum
(13)
Bronze
(5)
Bronze Statue of a Victorious Youth
(1)
Brueghel
(1)
Bruno Lohse
(3)
Brussels
(1)
Bührle Collection Theft
(4)
Bulgaria
(4)
Burke and Wills
(2)
Burns Mummies
(1)
Byzantine Artifacts
(4)
Cairo
(1)
Cairo art theft
(2)
California Raids
(6)
Caligula
(1)
Cambodia
(11)
Camille Pissarro
(7)
Carabinieri
(6)
Caravaggio
(1)
catalogue raisonné
(1)
Cellini Salt Cellar
(2)
Central Park
(1)
Cerveteri
(1)
Chance Finds
(3)
Charles Goldie
(1)
Chihuly Glass
(1)
China
(16)
Christie's
(14)
Church Thefts
(6)
Civil War
(2)
Claude Monet
(4)
Claudia Seger-Thomschitz
(3)
Cleveland Bronze Apollo
(2)
Cleveland Museum of Art (CMA)
(5)
Coins
(7)
Colonial Art
(1)
Columbia
(1)
Conferences
(7)
Conservation
(1)
Conventions
(1)
Copyright
(5)
Corot
(1)
Corrections
(1)
cosmpoplitanism
(4)
Costa Rica
(2)
CPIA
(10)
criminal charges
(5)
criminology
(1)
Crystal Bridges Museum
(5)
Cultral Property Advisory Committee
(9)
Cultural First Aid
(2)
cultural heritage
(6)
cultural heritage careers
(2)
Cultural Heritage Moot Court Competition
(2)
Cultural heritage movement
(1)
cultural justice
(3)
cultural policy
(18)
cultural property
(4)
Cultural Resource Management
(1)
cultural security
(1)
culture funding
(1)
curatorial theft
(2)
Cycladic Figurines
(1)
Cyprus
(9)
Dahshour
(1)
Dallas Museum of Art (DMA)
(2)
Database
(5)
Databases
(4)
DCMS
(2)
Deaccessioning
(24)
Dead Sea Scrolls
(1)
Dealing in Cultural Objects (Offences) Act 2003
(4)
Declaratory Suits
(4)
Demand and Refusal
(2)
Design and Artists Copyright Society
(1)
Detroit Institute of Art
(1)
development
(1)
Dick Ellis
(2)
Diplomatic Bags
(1)
Doctrine of Discovery
(3)
Donald Trump
(3)
Donny George Youkhanna
(2)
Dr. No
(6)
Droite de Suite
(2)
Dubai
(1)
due diligence
(5)
eBay
(5)
Economics
(1)
Ecuador
(1)
Edgar Degas
(2)
Edinburgh
(1)
Edoardo Almagia
(1)
Edvard Munch
(2)
Egon Schiele
(4)
Egypt
(55)
El-Hibeh
(2)
Elgin Marbles
(5)
empirical studies
(1)
England
(4)
environmental justice
(4)
Environmental law
(2)
Erik Nemeth
(1)
Etruscans
(2)
Euphronios Krater
(4)
European Court of Human Rights
(1)
Export Restrictions
(19)
Fakes
(6)
FBI
(16)
FBI Art Crime Team
(16)
Festivus
(1)
Fifth Circuit
(1)
fire
(1)
Fisk University
(3)
Footnotes
(59)
force multiplier
(1)
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)
(6)
forfeiture
(13)
Forgery
(27)
fossils
(2)
Four Corners Antiquities Investigation
(11)
fractional ownership
(2)
Francavilla Marittima
(1)
France
(30)
Francesco Rutelli
(15)
Frans van Mieris
(2)
Frederick Schultz
(3)
freedman's town
(2)
Gaza
(1)
George Grosz
(1)
Georgia
(1)
Georgia O'Keeffe
(2)
Germanicus
(2)
Germany
(16)
Getty
(1)
Ghent Altarpiece
(1)
Giacomo Medici
(6)
Gianfranco Becchina
(1)
Golf
(3)
good faith
(3)
Goya
(3)
Goya theft
(4)
graffiti
(1)
Greece
(38)
Grosz
(1)
Henri Matisse
(1)
Henry Moore
(1)
Heritage at Risk
(1)
heritage crime
(1)
Heritage Crime in Art
(1)
Hermitage
(2)
High Court in London
(4)
historic documents
(1)
Historic Landmark
(1)
historic preservation
(1)
historic weapons
(1)
Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act
(2)
Hopi
(1)
House of Commons Illicit Trade Advisory Panel (ITAP)
(1)
Houston
(2)
Howard Spiegler
(2)
Human Remains
(5)
Human Rights
(1)
Hungary
(1)
Identification
(1)
illicit excavation
(1)
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(16)
Immunity
(6)
Immunity from Seizure Act (ISA)
(3)
import restrictions
(3)
in the media
(7)
Indemnity
(1)
Indianapolis Museum of Art
(5)
indictments
(5)
Indigenous Rights
(2)
Indonesia
(1)
injunctions
(1)
Insider Theft
(2)
Institute d'Egypte
(1)
Institute of Art and Law
(1)
Institutional theft
(1)
Intellectual Property
(4)
Intentional Destruction
(6)
International Criminal Court (ICC)
(1)
International Journal of Cultural Property
(1)
internationalism
(4)
INTERPOL
(1)
Interview
(2)
Interviews
(2)
Iran
(8)
Iran v. Barakat Galleries Ltd.
(6)
Iran v. Berend
(3)
Iraq
(46)
Isabella Stuart Gardner Museum
(7)
Islamic art
(2)
Israel
(4)
Istanbul
(2)
Italian Art Squad
(5)
Italian Culture Ministry
(6)
Italy
(122)
Jacques Goudstikker
(4)
James Ossuary
(1)
Jan Breugel the elder
(2)
Jan van Eyck
(1)
Japan
(3)
Jeanneret v. Vichy
(1)
Jeff Tweedy
(1)
Jenack v. Rabizadeh
(1)
JMW Turner
(2)
John Constable
(1)
Jonah Marbles
(1)
Jonathan Tokeley-Parry
(1)
Jordan
(2)
Joseph Farquharson
(2)
Journal Articles
(1)
Journal of Art Crime
(1)
Ka-Nefer-Nefer
(9)
Kansas
(2)
Kansas City
(1)
Kazimir Malevich
(3)
Kenya
(1)
Kingsland
(3)
Klimt
(3)
Koh Ker
(6)
Konowaloff v. Metropolitan Museum of Art
(1)
Kunsthal Museum Theft
(2)
La Dea Di Morgantina
(6)
Lawrence Kaye
(1)
Lebanon
(1)
Leonardo Da Vinci
(9)
Leopold Museum
(1)
Lewis Chessmen
(5)
lex originis
(3)
lex situs
(5)
Libya
(2)
Lincoln's Inn theft
(1)
Lithographs
(1)
loans
(5)
London
(6)
London Art and Antiques Unit
(7)
London Metropolitan Police
(2)
loot
(1)
looting
(30)
Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA)
(2)
Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA)
(1)
LS Lowry
(3)
Lucas Cranach
(1)
Lucas Cranach the Elder
(3)
Lucian Freud
(1)
Macedonia
(1)
Machu Picchu
(12)
Madonna of the Yarnwinder (recovery)
(9)
Mali
(4)
Malta
(1)
Manchester
(2)
manuscript
(1)
Maori
(2)
maps
(2)
Marc Chagall
(1)
Marion True
(25)
Mark Landis
(1)
market overt
(1)
Mausoleum at Helicarnassus
(1)
Max Stern
(3)
Maxwell Anderson
(3)
metal detecting
(6)
Metropolitan Museum of Art (the Met)
(29)
Mexico
(9)
Meyer de Haan
(1)
MFA Boston
(6)
Michael Brand
(3)
Michael C. Carlos Museum
(1)
Michael Steinhardt
(2)
Middle Eastern Geodatabase for Antiquities (MEGA)
(1)
Minneapolis Institue of Arts (MIA)
(1)
Moctezuma's Headdress
(1)
Modigliani
(2)
MoMA
(4)
Mondrian
(1)
Monet
(3)
Montreal Museum of Fine Art
(2)
Monument Men
(5)
Monuments Men
(1)
Moral Rights
(3)
Morgantina
(2)
Morgantina Aphrodite
(9)
Morgantina Treasure
(1)
Moscow
(2)
Musée d'Art Moderne theft
(1)
Museum Acquisitions
(1)
Museum Governance
(1)
Museum of Anatolian Civilizations
(1)
Museum of Fine Arts in Boston
(6)
museum security
(2)
museum theft
(2)
Museums Libraries and Archives Council (MLA)
(1)
Music
(2)
Myth
(1)
Napoleon III
(1)
National Academy
(2)
National Archaeological Museum in Naples
(1)
National Archives
(3)
National Gallery (Washington)
(1)
National Historic Preservation Act
(2)
National Stolen Property Act
(8)
nations of origin
(5)
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
(8)
Native Americans
(17)
native cultures
(2)
Nazi Spoliation
(74)
Neglect
(1)
Neil Brodie
(1)
Nelson-Atkins' Bloch Building
(1)
Netherlands
(10)
New Acropolis Museum
(3)
New Orleans
(4)
New York
(6)
New Zealand
(7)
Nigeria
(1)
nighthawking
(3)
Noah Charney
(1)
Norbert Schimmel
(1)
Norman Palmer
(1)
Norman Rockwell
(2)
Norway
(4)
NSPA
(1)
Nuclear Analytical Techniques
(1)
Odyssey Marine Exploration
(23)
Olympics
(2)
Omaha Nebraska
(1)
Organized Crime
(1)
Orphaned Works
(2)
Oskar Kokoschka
(2)
Oslo
(1)
Pablo Picasso
(16)
Pakistan
(2)
Palestine
(3)
Panama
(1)
Paolo Ferri
(2)
Paris
(10)
partage
(1)
Parthenon Marbles
(17)
Patents
(1)
Patty Gerstenblith
(1)
Paul Bator
(2)
Paul Cezanne
(5)
Paul Gauguin
(4)
Pazardzhik Byzantine Silver Hoard
(1)
Penn Museum
(1)
Pentagon
(1)
Pere Lachaise
(1)
Persepolis
(3)
Peru
(24)
Peru Headdress
(1)
Peter Watson
(1)
Philadelphia
(7)
Phillipines
(1)
Picasso
(9)
Pierre Le Guennec
(1)
Pierre Valentin
(1)
piracy
(1)
Pollock
(1)
Pompeii
(3)
Popular Culture
(1)
Portable Antiquities Scheme
(25)
Portrait of Wally
(11)
Poussin
(1)
pre-Columbian antiquities
(2)
pre-emptive archaeology
(1)
Prince Claus Fund
(1)
Princeton
(4)
Private Collectors
(2)
Private International Law
(5)
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (UK)
(1)
Prosecutions
(7)
provenance
(13)
Prussia
(1)
Public Art Theft
(5)
Public Trust
(1)
Publications
(2)
Quran
(1)
Radio
(2)
Ransom
(2)
realkulturpolitik
(1)
recovery
(45)
Rembrandt
(2)
Rene Magritte
(2)
Renoir
(2)
Renvoi
(3)
repatriation
(121)
Restitution
(40)
reward
(1)
Rhodes
(1)
Robert Hecht
(8)
Robin Symes
(1)
Rodin
(2)
Roger Atwood
(1)
Roman Objects
(2)
Rome
(3)
Rothko
(1)
Royal Academy
(1)
Rubens
(3)
Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran
(2)
Russia
(11)
Sale of "The Cello Player"
(1)
Sale of the "Gross Clinic"
(11)
Sale of the Stieglitz Collection
(4)
Salvage
(1)
Sao Paulo
(2)
Sao Paulo Museum of Art
(3)
Scheduled Ancient Monuments
(1)
Scholarship - Articles and Essays
(57)
Scholarship - Book Reviews
(3)
Scholarship - Books
(12)
Scholarship - Case Notes
(1)
Scholarship - Events and Conferences
(55)
Scholarship - Journal Articles
(12)
Scholarship - Student Papers
(16)
Scotland
(7)
Scotland Yard's Arts and Antiques Squad
(1)
scrap metal
(1)
Sculpture
(2)
security
(4)
seizure
(16)
Selling stolen art
(1)
seminars
(1)
semiotics
(1)
Sentencing
(2)
Serbia
(1)
settlement
(1)
Sevso Treasure
(6)
Shelby White
(3)
shipwreck
(1)
Sicily
(4)
Simon Mackenzie
(2)
Sisley
(4)
Slovakia
(1)
Smithsonian
(4)
Solomon R. Guggenheim
(1)
Sonic Fingerprints
(1)
Sotheby's
(13)
Sotheby's Paris
(1)
South Africa
(1)
South America
(1)
Spain
(21)
Spoliation
(2)
Spoliation Advisory Panel
(8)
St. Louis Art Museum
(8)
St. Ninian's Isle Treasure
(3)
Stair Gallery
(2)
State Department
(2)
Statue of a Victorious Youth
(1)
statute of frauds
(1)
Statutes of Limitations
(10)
Stephane Breitwieser
(1)
Stephen Colbert
(1)
Steven Spielberg
(1)
stewardship
(2)
Stolen Art
(11)
Stone Age
(1)
street art
(1)
study collections
(1)
Summer Palace Bronzes
(7)
Sweden
(2)
Switzerland
(13)
Syria
(7)
Taliban
(1)
Tennessee
(3)
The Art Fund
(1)
The Bowers Museum
(1)
The Discovery Rule
(4)
the fourth ward
(1)
The Getty
(58)
The Gross Clinic
(1)
The Guggenheim
(2)
The Holocauset (stolen art) restitution bill
(2)
the Louvre
(2)
The Menil
(4)
The National Gallery
(1)
The National Gallery (London)
(2)
the Pirate Party
(1)
The Scream
(1)
theft
(2)
Thomas Eakins
(9)
Thomas Jefferson
(1)
Timbuktu
(2)
Titian
(1)
Toledo Museum of Art
(4)
tombaroli
(2)
tourism
(1)
transparency
(1)
Traprain Law
(1)
Traveling Exhibitions
(2)
Treasure Act
(4)
treasure trove
(3)
Turkey
(11)
UCC
(1)
Ukraine
(2)
UN
(2)
Underground Salt Museum
(1)
Underwater Cultural Heritage
(32)
Underwater Sites - "Black Swan"
(3)
Underwater Sites - "Blue Baron"
(1)
Underwater Sites - HMS Victory
(3)
UNESCO
(23)
UNESCO Convention
(24)
UNESCO Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage
(9)
UNIDROIT Convention
(2)
United Kingdom
(24)
United States
(12)
University College London
(1)
University of Chicago
(1)
University of Guelph
(1)
University of Virginia
(3)
urban development
(1)
Van Gogh
(7)
Vandalism
(4)
Vatican
(1)
Vermeer
(2)
Victoria And Albert Museum
(3)
Vigango
(3)
viking
(1)
Villa Giulia
(3)
Vineberg v. Bissonnette
(4)
Visual Artists Rights Act
(2)
voluntary returns
(1)
Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena
(3)
Watts Towers
(1)
Waverley Criteria
(10)
Week in Review
(3)
West Bank
(1)
wikiloot
(1)
Wilco
(1)
William S. Burroughs
(1)
Windsor Antiquities Indictment
(1)
World Heritage Sites
(1)
World War II
(11)
Yale University
(13)
year in review
(2)
Zahi Hawass
(9)